HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15763 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. On the oral request of learned counsel for the writ petitioner, he is permitted to correct the prayer clause. 2. Heard Sri Amit Kumar Rajput, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Vivek Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that pursuant to a notification dated 31.03.2023, an advertisement came to be published on 15.10.2024 for appointment of Aganwadi Karyakatri by the District Program Officer. 4. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that the respondent no. 6 has been selected though the writ petitioner is fully eligible and qualified as she and the respondent no. 6 is running a Community Health Centre and further in the family, Government jobs are there. 5. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel submits that the claim of the writ petitioner shall be decided by District Program Officer, Prayagraj. 6. Considering the submission so made across the bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and certified copy of the order before the fourth respondent, District Program Officer by 07.11.2025. Thereafter, the fourth respondent shall decide the claim of the writ petitioner within a period of two months. Any appointment so made in favour of the respondent no. 6 shall be subject to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Rajput, Dhananjay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Sarla Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) the orders may be passed. 7. With the said observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 28, 2025 Rajesh WRIA No. 15763 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad