Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17126 (BOM)

SHIVRAM S/O BHAURAM HAJARE AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND OTHERS

CA/6843/2025 · 2025-07-08

Shri Shailesh P Brahme

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 936.CA.6843-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6843 OF 2025 IN X-OBJST/13869/2025 SHIVRAM S/O BHAURAM HAJARE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Rakhunde Pravin B. AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. B.A. Shinde … CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 8th JULY 2025 PER COURT : 1. Applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 2040 days in preferring Cross-objection. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay is sought to be condoned. It is further contended that First Appeals preferred by the Acquiring Body are still pending. 3. Learned AGP opposes the application. It is submitted that no proper reasons are assigned for condoning delay. 4. First Appeals preferred by the Respondent are yet to be decided on merits. Applicants are ready to forgo interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. The practical approach is to 2025:BHC-AUG:17619 2 936.CA.6843-2025.doc condone delay and to consider the Cross-objection along with First Appeal. 5. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ on condition that Applicants shall not be entitled to interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period, in case they succeed in their Cross-objection. SHAILESH P. BRAHME JUDGE NAJEEB..