HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36817 of 2025 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State- respondent and perused the record. 2. This bail application has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant, Bhushan seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No.357 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 125, 131, 351(3), 352, 333, 118(2) of B.N.S., Police Station- Jani, District- Meerut. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the accused-applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number due to family dispute. The informant is real uncle of the applicant. It is submitted that accused appellant has not been assigned any specific role in the First Information Report. In the statement of injured Shyam Chaudhary, no specific role has been assigned to the applicant. As per medical report available on record, it appears that injured sustained grievous injury. There is missing of teeth. In the injury report, there are 4- 5 injuries shown on the person of the injured which are lacerated wounds. It is argued that charge-sheet has already been submitted, therefore, there is no reasonable possibility of intimidating or pressurizing the prosecution witnesses. It is further argued that the accused applicant has no criminal history and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. The applicant is languishing in jail since 10.09.2025. Hence, bail has been prayed for. 4. Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the above submissions. 5. Considering the fact that the accused applicant is in jail since Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vijay Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Bhushan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 10.09.2025 and has no criminal history; accused appellant has not been assigned the specific role and involvement in committing the alleged offence, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. 6. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 7. Let the accused-applicant, Bhushan involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: i. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. iii. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. iv. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. 8. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. October 27, 2025 Gss BAIL No. 36817 of 2025 2 (Santosh Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- GIRAJA SHANKER SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad