HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15988 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Mohd. Yasin, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Vijay Lal, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that though the writ petitioner has been paid other benefits but he has not been paid 10% of the entire amount of insurance, gratuity, NPS and other emoluments from 18.12.2019 to 26.08.2025. 3. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel submits that the claim of the writ petitioner shall be decided by second respondent, the Executive Engineer Electricity and Mechanical Section, Public Works Department, Prayagraj. 4. Considering the submission so made across the bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and certified copy of the order before the second respondent, second respondent, the Executive Engineer Electricity and Mechanical Section, Public Works Department, Prayagraj by 07.11.2025. Thereafter, the second respondent shall decide the claim of the writ petitioner within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of the order. 5. With the said observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 30, 2025/Rajesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Srivastava, Mohammad Yaseen Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Ram Surat @ Ram Surat Bind .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad