Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:60020 Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4489 of 2025 Applicant :- Ramesh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Uppadhaya,Kartikeya Shukla,Ved Prakash Tiwari,Vinay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shekhar Gangal Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. 2. Heard Sri Kartikeya Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Shekhar Gangal, learned counsel for the first informant, Sri Ajay Singh, learned AGA-I for the State and perused the material on record. 3. This bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the applicant Ramesh, seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No. 555 of 2024, under Sections 85, 80(2) BNS and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, registered at P.S. Iglas, District Aligarh. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant argued as follows: (i) The applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. (ii) The applicant is the father-in-law of the deceased Varsha. (iii) The marriage of the deceased Varsha was solemnized with Rahul son of the applicant on 09.12.2023. (iv) General and omnibus allegations have been levelled against the applicant. In the FIR there is no disclosure at all as to what was the actual demand. (v) Postmortem examination report shows that the cause of death is asphyxia as a result of antemortem hanging. (vi) Rahul the husband of the deceased is in jail. The investigation in the matter has concluded and charge sheet has been submitted on 12.12.2024 on which the court concerned has taken cognizance on 15.01.2025, para 20 and 21 of the affidavit has been placed. (vii) The applicant has no criminal history as stated in para 24 of the affidavit and is in jail since 13.10.2024. 5. Per contra, learned counsel for the first informant and learned counsel for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the applicant is named in the FIR and there are allegations against him. 6. After having heard learned counsels for the parties and perusing the records, it is evident that the applicant is the father-in-law of the deceased. The cause of death is asphyxia as a result of antemortem hanging. Rahul the husband of the deceased is in jail. 7. Looking to the facts and circumstances of this case, the nature of evidence and also the absence of any convincing material to indicate the possibility of tampering with the evidence, this Court is of the view that the applicant may be enlarged on bail. 8. Let the applicant Ramesh, be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence and will not harm or harass the victim/complainant in any manner whatsoever. ii) The applicant will abide the orders of court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever. (iii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that she/he shall not seek any adjournment on the date fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever. In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure her/him presence proclamation under section 84 BNSS, 2023 may be issued and if applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against her/him, in accordance with law, under section 209 BNS, 2023. (v) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 351 BNSS, 2023. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against her/him in accordance with law and the trial court may proceed against her/him under Section 269 BNS, 2023. (vi) The trial court may make all possible efforts/endeavour and try to conclude the trial expeditiously after the release of the applicant. 9. The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison. 10. The bail application is allowed. 11. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. Order Date :- 22.4.2025 M. ARIF (Samit Gopal, J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad