HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 2655 of 2025 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard Sri Kailash Nath Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ravi Singh Parihar, learned standing counsel appearing for the State-respondents. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking following relief: "(I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 / Deputy Director of Consolidation, District Jaunpur to decide the Revision No. 661 of 2024-25 (Arun Kumar Vs. Vijay Bahadur) under Section 48(1) of the U.P.C.H. Act situated at Village Purateji, Pargana Haveli, Tehsil Sadar, District Jaunpur." 3. This Court vide order dated 23.07.2025 had directed the learned standing counsel to obtain instruction in the matter. 4. Learned standing counsel has informed that despite issuance of letter, no instructions have been received till date in the matter. 5. In view of the aforesaid, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending. 6. Without entering into the merits of the controversy, the respondent no. 2 / Deputy Director of Consolidation, Jaunpur is directed to decide the Revision No. 661 of 2024-25 (Arun Kumar Vs. Vijay Bahadur) under Section 48(1) of the U.P.C.H. Act on Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kailash Nath Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Anil Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 10 Others .....Respondent(s) merits after giving an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law expeditiously say preferably within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 7. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. October 29, 2025 Arif WRIB No. 2655 of 2025 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad