Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1712 (CHH)

SMT. MEENA KURRE v. SMT. USHA LAKDA

CONT/79/2025 · 2025-01-16

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:2623 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 79 of 2025 • Smt. Meena Kurre, W/o Ramnarayan Kurre, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Ward No.5, Hasdo Para, Chipchipi, Post Office Koda, Tehsil Khadgawan, District Koriya (C.G.), Presently Working As Incharge Hostel Superintendent, Category-D, Tribal Boys Hostel, Katgodi, District Koriya (C.G.). ... Petitioner/Applicant Versus 1. Smt. Usha Lakda, Posted As Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development Koriya, Office Of Collector (Tribal Welfare) Koriya (C.G.). 2. Smt. Chandan Sanjay Tripathi, Posted As Collector, Tribal Welfare, Koriya, Office Of Collector (Tribal Development) District Koriya (C.G.). 3. Jitendra Gupta, Posted As District Education Officer, Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.). 4. Arvind Singh, Posted As Block Education Officer, Sonhat, District Koriya (C.G.). ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner/Applicant : Mr. Chitendra Singh, Advocate. For respondents : Mr. Keshav Gupta, counsel appears on behalf of Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, Advocate, on instructions. Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 16/01/2025 1. This Contempt petition has been preferred by the applicant under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act,1971 for non-compliance of the order dated 10.12.2024 passed in WP(S) No.8075/2024. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that order under contempt has been complied with by the respondent authorities. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents conceded the submission of learned counsel for applicant that the order under contempt has been complied with. 2 4. In view of the fact that respondent authorities have complied with the order dated 10.12.2024 passed in WP(S) No.8075/2024 of this Court, as contended by both the parties, nothing remains in instant contempt case. Thus, no case of contempt is made out, as such I do not find any reason to proceed further in the matter, initiating contempt proceeding against the respondents. 5. Accordingly, contempt proceeding is dropped. No order as to costs. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge DEEPTI JHA NIRALA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA NIRALA Date: 2025.01.16 16:59:45 +0530