Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17118 (UTT)

GURVINDER SINGH ALIAS GOPI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/1852/2025 · 2025-11-28

Alok Mahra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS BA1 No. 1852 of 2025 Hon ’ble Alok Mah r a, J. Mr. Dinesh Chandra Dimri (through V.C.) and Mr. Navneet Singh, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Chitrartha Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. The applicants – Gurvinder Singh and Rajendra Singh, who are in judicial custody in connection with Case Crime No. 53 of 2025, FIR dated 20.06.2025 in FIR No. 0002 of 2025, under Sections 309(4), 351(3), 352, 74, 317(2) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023, registered at P.S.- Govindghat, District Chamoli, has sought his release on bail. 4. In this case, an FIR was lodged 20.06.2025 by the complainant Prem Kumar alleging therein that on the night of 19.06.2025, when the complainant was sitting alongwith his friends, bottom to the bridge constructed over the river ahead of Ghangaria, some unknown persons were watching them and all of the sudden, those persons, covering their face with clothes, came close to them and started using abusive language with them, beaten them with sticks, snatched money from their wallets and threatened them of life consequences. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 6. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicants have no previous criminal history; they have already undergone the incarceration period of more than three months as they are languishing in jail since 22.06.2025; chargesheet has already been filed in the case and there is no chance of tampering with the evidences; and, that all the offences in this case are triable by Magistrate. 7. Per contra, learned State Counsel vehemently opposed the bail application. 8. Having considered the submissions, under the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that all the offences are triable by Magistrate, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicants deserve to be enlarged on bail. 9. Accordingly, the present bail application is allowed. 10. Let the applicants be released on bail on their executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties each of the like amount, by each one of them, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. ( Alok Mah r a J.) 28.11.2025 Ujjwal