POONAM v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME, LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
A483/951/2024 · 2025-01-03
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 171128 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 171128 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:492 Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 951 of 2024 Applicant :- Poonam Opposite Party :- The State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhir Kumar Pandey,Komal Chaurasia Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for respondent State. Notices to respondent nos.2,3 and 4 are dispensed with in view of the proposed order. The application seeks direction to the learned Civil Judge Fast Track Court/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar to proceed/decide the Complaint Case No.757 of 2015, Poonam vs. Vinay Kumar and others, under Section 498-A, 323 IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Raje Sultanpur, District Ambedkar Nagar, within stipulated time.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the complaint case (supra) is pending since 2015. Till date only statements of P.W.1,2 and 3 have been recorded. The case is fixed for further evidence under Section 244 Cr.P.C. He further submits that sufficient time has passed and no progress has been taken place in the trial. Considering the above, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial proceedings expeditiously, say within a period of one year from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. With the above directions, the application is disposed of.
Order Date :- 3.1.2025 Madhu D.R/P.S Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench