Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD MFA No.3115 OF 2014(MV)
BETWEEN:
T G VADIRAJ 22 YEARS S/O T. GURURAJA RAO RESIDING AT NO.246 43RD CROSS, 9TH MAIN V BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BANGALORE-560041.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI.CHANDRASHEKAR R., ADV.)
AND 1 . THE COMMISSIONER
B.B.M.P., N.R SQUARE
BANGALORE-02.
2 . THE DIRECTOR
K.G.I.D., MOTOR BRANCH
AMBEDKAR BEEDHI
BANGALORE 560001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. DILIP KUMAR K., HCGP FOR R2:
V/O DATED: 09.06.2015 NOTICE TO R1 IS D/W)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:11.07.2013 PASSED IN MVC NO.6222/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE VI
2 ADDITIONAL JUDGE AND MEMBER-MACT, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES,BENGALURU CITY (SCCH-2), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS MFA, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THIS COURT, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
None appears for the appellant.
On 28.05.2021, since there was no representation for the appellant, the matter was listed on 07.07.2021. Again on 07.07.2021, since there was no representation for the appellant, the matter was ordered to be listed on
26.07.2021. Even on 26.07.2021 none appeared for the appellant. Hence as a last chance, the matter was adjourned for two weeks. Even today also, there is no representation for the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not diligent in prosecuting the case. Hence, the matter is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE
HA/-