Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17110 (JHR)

RATAN SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3948/2024 · 2025-04-17

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:11638 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.3948 of 2024 ------ Ratan Saw, son of Jagdish Saw, resident of Village Rajguru, P.O. Shibla, P.S. Balumath, District Latehar. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Sinha, A.P.P. ----- 07/ 17.04.2025 This anticipatory bail application under Section 438 and 440 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has been preferred by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Tandwa P.S. Case No.107 of 2022, for offences under Sections 379, 411 and 34 IPC and Section 30(ii) of Coal Mines Act. The case is presently pending before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chatra. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite party – State. 3. The petitioner is one of the owners of the motorcycle which was used in transporting illegally mined coal. 4. Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that it is not clear that how much coal has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. 5. Opportunity was granted to the State to oppose the anticipatory bail, which the State availed and opposed. 6. Considering the fact that the petitioner is the owner of the motorcycle which was engaged and facilitating in transportation of illegally mined coal, it is not a case for grant of anticipatory bail. 7. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application is dismissed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant. Cp-3