Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17110 (GAU)

RAHMAN TARIQUE MASHUD v. ARJOO AHMED

I.A.(Crl.)/836/2025 · 2025-10-12

Anjan Moni Kalita

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010172122025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/836/2025 RAHMAN TARIQUE MASHUD S/O LT MOTIUR RAHMAN, R/O H NO 115 A KUMARPARA PANCHALI PO AND PS BHARALUMUKH, DIST. KAMRUP (M), GUWAHATI, ASSAM PIN-781009. VERSUS ARJOO AHMED D/O KHASNUR, ALI, W/O RAHMAN TARIQUE MASHUD R/O H. NO 116, NIJORAPAR, PO AND PS NOONMATI, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN-781020 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. H BURAGOHAIN, Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 13-10-2025 Heard Mr. S. Biswas learned counsel for the applicant. This is an application to bring on record the affidavit declaring assets and liabilities of the petitioner, which was filed before the learned Family Court No.3, Kamrup(M) in FC (Criminal) 217/2024. Page No.# 2/2 Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the aforesaid affidavit containing assets and liabilities could not be filed with the connected revision petition due to an inadvertent error and therefore, he prays that the affidavit may be allowed to be brought on record by way of an additional affidavit. Prayer is allowed. Let the affidavit containing assets and liabilities of the petitioner be brought on record by way of filing an additional affidavit by the applicant within a week. I.A. stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant