Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1711 (AP)

Sri M. Ranna Raju, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/32067/2025 · 2026-04-26

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010620132025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 32067/2025 Between: 1. SRI M. RANNA RAJU,, S/O. M. VENKATA KRISHNA RAJU, AGED 47 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 1-1/48- 1-39, SRI NAGAR, AKKAYYAPALEM POST, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT- 53001 6. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DISTRICT MINES AND GEOLOGY OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, 2 more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly the respondent no. 3 in issuing the impugned order in L.Dis. Proceedings No. 230/Q2V/2018, dated 15.10.2025, as being illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional consequentially direct the respondents not to give effect to the impugned revocation order n L.Dis. Proceedings No. 230/Q2V/2018, dated 15.10.2025, with a direction to extend the time for execution of the Lease Deed until the final disposal of the present Writ Petition and the connected W.P. No. 12788 of 2023 and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents not to give effect to the impugned revocation order n L.Dis. Proceedings No. 230/Q2V/2018, dated 15.10.2025, with a direction to extend the time for execution of the Lease Deed until the final disposal of the present Writ Petition and the connected W.P. No. 12788 of 2023 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 32067 of 2025 The Court made the following Order: Sri V.Sai Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner basing on the specific instructions from his client, submits that the respondent authorities have assured the petitioner that adequate compensation will be provided by allotting alternate land and hence, he sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 2. Sri Pattivada Rama Krishna, learned Government Pleader for Mines and Geology submits that he has no instructions regarding the alleged assurance given by respondent authorities. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Recording the submission made by respective counsel, without expressing any opinion, the instant Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 27.04.2026 PSA