SHIV RAM AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOUSING URBAN PLANNING GOVT. LKO AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/11453/2024 · 2025-01-16
Brij Raj Singh, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 171081 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 171081 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2751-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11453 of 2024 Petitioner :- Shiv Ram And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Housing Urban Planning Govt. Lko And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Shukla,Gaurav Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. Petitioner should correct the seriatum of the reliefs claimed. If certiorari is being sought and mandamus is concequential to it then the first prayer should be seeking a certiorari especially in a case where the order impugned is of 08.01.2021. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid as far as it may be permissible in law and keeping the question of delay and laches open for consideration. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 16.1.2025 Shanu/- Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench