Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:468 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12922 of 2024 Petitioner :- Dr. Arvind Kumar Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Kriashi Shiksha Evam Anusandhan Lko And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Chandra Tewari,Shahjabeen Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 and 5 and Shri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 to 4. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being finally decided. The instant writ petition has been filed contending that despite the petitioner having retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.12.2023 his retiral dues have still not been paid till date. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the reliefs sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before the respondent no.3 i.e. Director (Administration & Monitoring), Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned Counsel for the respondents have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.3 then respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and the relevant rules within a further period of four weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. It is also provided that in case the respondent no. 3 finds that he is incapable of deciding the same then he/she would remit the same to the competent authority who in turn will decide the representation within the time as provided aforesaid. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. Order Date :- 3.1.2025/J. K. Dinkar Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench