GAYA PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. LUCKNOW AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/11367/2024 · 2025-01-16
Brij Raj Singh, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 171068 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 171068 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2701-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11367 of 2024 Petitioner :- Gaya Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lucknow And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rohitash Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sarvesh Kumar Dubey Hon'ble Rajan Roy, J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J.
1. It is a backlog fresh. It has been listed at least five times in the backlog fresh cases. None appears for the petitioner. However, learned Standing Counsel and Sri Abhinav Singh,
learned counsel who has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.4, which is taken on record, are present.
2. Writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. However, dismissal will not come in the way of the competent authority in referring the matter under Section 3H(4) of the National Highways Act, 1956 on the application of the petitioner if the case is covered by the said provision. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.)
Order Date :- 16.1.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench