VIJAY v. The State rep by The Station House Officer
CRL OP/28995/2025 · 2025-10-25
K Rajasekar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 171035 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 171035 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.OP.No.28995 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.10.2025 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.28995 of 2025 Vijay
... Petitioner Vs. State Rep by Station House Officer, Mandharakuppam Police Station, Cuddalore District. ... Respondent (Cr.No.141 of 2025) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.141 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police Station. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ragul Kousik For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 04.10.2025 for the alleged offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 310(1), 351(3), 140(3) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No.141 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.28995 of 2025
2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, the petitioner joining hands with other accused formed an unlawful assembly and attacked the defacto complainant with deadly weapons and caused grievous injuries to him. Further, they have attempted to abduct him. Hence, complaint was lodged against the petitioner.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in judicial custody from 04.10.2025. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and reported that the petitioner is having bad antecedents and he is having three previous cases. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.28995 of 2025
6. Considering the nature of allegations and the fact that the petitioner is having three previous cases, I am not inclined to grant bail to this petitioner.
7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 25.10.2025 Vv To
1. The District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Neyveli.
2. The Station House Officer, Mandharakuppam Police Station, Cuddalore District.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.28995 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR
, J.
Vv Crl.O.P.No.28995 of 2025 25.10.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis