PARAMRAJ SINGH DHALIWAL ALIAS UMRANANGAL v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/1926/2024 · 2025-09-12
Jagmohan Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17101 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17101 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
217 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
****
CWP-1926-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.09.2025
Paramraj Singh Dhaliwal @ Umranangal
...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and Others
...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- Mr. S.S. Saron, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab.
****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that in view of affidavit of respondent, nothing survives in this petition.
2.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
3.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE 12.09.2025 Prince Chawla
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.09.12 14:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document