Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17100 (JHR)

MANISH KUMAR v. JHARKHAND STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN

WPC/3132/2025 · 2025-07-07

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:19486 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 3132 of 2025 --------- Manish Kumar, aged about 38 years, son of Sambhu Prasad Sah, resident of Village- Chakarmar, P.O. & P.S. Mohanpur, District- Deoghar. ......Petitioner Versus 1. Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission through its Chairman, Kali Nagar, Chaibagan, P.O. & P.S.-Namkum, District-Ranchi; 2. Secretary, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Kali Nagar, Chaibagan, P.O. & P.S. Namkum, District Ranchi; 3. Examination Controller, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Kali Nagar, Chaibagan, P.O. & P.S.-Namkum, District-Ranchi; .....Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate For the Resp.-JSSC : M/s. Sanjoy Piprawall, Prince Kumar, Rakesh Ranjan, Jay Prakash, Advocates --------- 02/Dated:-07.07.2025 1. Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein for a direction upon the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner and remove his name from the Notice No.62 dated 13.05.2025 (Annexure-6); whereby the registration/application number of the petitioner has been included in the list of cancelled applications and further prays for release of the result of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of the representation filed by the petitioner before the concerned respondent, the grievance of the petitioner has not been redressed and the same is still pending. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly submits 2025:JHHC:19486 2 that since no counter affidavit has been filed; as such, the petitioner may be directed to approach the concerned respondent to look into the matter, so that if the case of the petitioner would be found suitable, he may pass necessary order. 5. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions and without going into the merits of the case, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the respondent No.3 to look into the grievance of the petitioner by treating this writ application as representation and take a decision in the matter by passing a reasoned and speaking order as per the applicable rules and regulations within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner. The petitioner shall serve the copy of this writ application to the concerned respondent for convenience. 6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the instant writ application stands disposed of. Pending I.A., if any, also stands closed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) vikas/-