STATE OF MANIPUR AND 2 ORS v. KSHETRIMAYUM BRAJAMANI SINGH
Review.Pet./22/2019 · 2025-01-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1710 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1710 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
Item No. 9 & 10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
MC(Review.Pet.)No.20 of 2019 With Review Pet.No.22 of 2019
State of Manipur & 2 Ors. Applicants Vs.
Kshetrimayum Brajamani Singh. Respondent
BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. D. KRISHNAKUMAR
24.01.2025
Mr. Lenin Hijam, learned AG, appears for the applicants and Mr. A. Mohendro, learned counsel, appears for the respondent. Mr. Lenin Hijam, learned AG for the applicants would submit that pursuant to the order passed by this Court, the respondent department has settled the claim amount to the petitioner and the review application has been filed by the department only on the ground that the writ petition is not maintainable. Since the issue on one hand is concerned that the respondent department has settled the admitted amount to the petitioner and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in the present case. However, the issue involved in the present case is left open to the petitioners to be decided in the appropriate case. In view of the above, the present cases are disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
John Kom