Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17098 (HP)

GURDEEP SINGH v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/7478/2024 · 2025-07-18

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.7478 of 2024 Decided on: 18.07.2025 _________________________________________________________________ Gurdeep Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Bonit Prakash, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant Advocate General. ________________________________________________________________ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Even though the respondents have not filed reply, however, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, matter is heard at this stage. 2. This petition has been filed for grant of following relief: - “i). That the Annexure P-1, may kindly be quashed and set aside and the respondents may kindly be directed to grant the benefits of ACPS after completion of 14 years to the petitioner, with all benefits incidental thereof.” 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that case of the petitioner and reliefs prayed for, have now been adjudicated upon in Sanjay Kumar Vs. State of HP and Ors2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be content if the case of the petitioner is considered by the respondents in light of the aforesaid judgment. Learned Assistant Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. 4. Having regard to above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, in light of aforesaid decision, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge July 18, 2025 R.Atal 2 CWPOA No.5536 of 2020, decided alongwith connected matters on 01.11.2023