Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17097 (GAU)

AMZAD HUSSAIN MAZARBHUIYA v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

I.A.(Civil)/2523/2025 · 2025-08-17

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010154402025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2523/2025 in WP(C)/4134/2025 AMZAD HUSSAIN MAZARBHUIYA S/O- LATE ABDUL JALIL MAZARBHUIYA R/O- VILL. AND P.O. MATIJURI P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788155. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS REP BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS TRANSPORT BHAWAN 1 PARLIAMENT STREET NEW DELHI-01 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM REVENUE (SETTLEMENT) DEPTT DISPUR GHY -06 3:THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANGER NHIDCL THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRSTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD (NHIDCL) PMU PESKAR LANE SONAI ROAD KANANKPUR PART -I CACHAR SILCHAR 4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER HAILAKANDI PIN-788151 5:THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER CUM ADDL. DISTRICT COMMISSIONER HAILAKANDI Page No.# 2/2 PIN-788151 6:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD BUILDING DIVISION CACHAR SILCHAR ------------ Advocate for : MR. A Y CHOUDHURY Advocate for : DY.S.G.I. appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 18.08.2025 Heard Shri A.Y. Choudhury, learned counsel for the applicants / writ petitioners, who by means of this I.A. has prayed for impleadment of the following incumbents as party respondent nos. 7, 8 and 9: 1. Abul Kalam Mazarbhuiya, 2. Karim Mazarbhuiya, Son of late Abdul Jabbar mazarbhuiya 3. Sahana Begum Barbhuiya, W/O late Abdul Kashim Mazarbhuiya, All are village & P.O.- Matijuri, PS & Dist.- Hailakandi, PIN-781 028. It is submitted that the aforesaid incumbents have been made a claim over the compensation amount which is the subject matter involved in the writ petition. After considering the subject matter, the I.A. is allowed and the aforesaid incumbents are permitted to be arrayed as the respondent nos. 7, 8 and 9 in the connected writ petition. The I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant