Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 170949 (ALL)

NAZAR IMAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PANCHAYATRAJ LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

/12839/2024 · 2025-01-07

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1103 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12839 of 2024 Petitioner :- Nazar Imam Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayatraj Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anoop Kumar,Sandeep Kumar Srivastava,Vineet Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Written instructions filed on behalf of the State today in Court is taken on record. 2. Heard Shri Sandeep Kumar, learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the material available on record. 3. The petitioner has assailed the order of transfer dated 12.12.2024 issued by the District Panchayat Raj Officer (Officiating), District Bahraich transferring the petitioner to Jarwal from his present place of posting at Vikas Khand, Kaisarganj, District Bahraich. The second grievance raised by the petitioner is that the petitioner has not been paid his salary for the month of November, 2024. 4. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press his prayer with regard to the impugned order of transfer dated 12.12.2024. Accordingly, the said prayer is rejected. 5. With regard to the second prayer, learned Standing Counsel at the very outset has submitted that by means of order dated 02.01.2025, the District Panchayat Raj Officer, Bahraich has given directions to the competent authority to release the salary of the petitioner for the month of November, 2024. 6. Learned counsel for petitioner at this stage also does not dispute the said instructions received by the learned Standing Counsel. 7. Considering the fact that the order for payment of salary has already been issued by the competent authority, the said grievance of the petitioner also does not survive. 8. In light of the statement made by learned Standing Counsel on the basis of instructions received from the District Panchayat Raj Officer, Bahraich, the present writ petition is consigned to record. 9. It is expected that the petitioner shall be paid his salary from November, 2024 onward regularly in accordance with law. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 7.1.2025 Virendra Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench