Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17091 (AP)

Ankala. Jagan Mohan, v. Vemulakonda. Nagaraju,

CRLP/3453/2020 · 2025-02-04

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010230772020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3453/2020 Between: 1. ANKALA. JAGAN MOHAN,, S/O GOPALA RAO,HINDU, AGE 54 YEAR R/O D.NO 61-2-1, BALAJI NAGAR, KRISHNALANAKA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. ANKALA. SAI NEERAJA,, W/O JAGAN MOHAN,HINDU, AGE 47 YEAR R/O D.NO 61-2-1, BALAJI NAGAR, KRISHNALANAKA, VIJAYAWADA. KRISHNA DISTRICT. ANDHARA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. VEMULAKONDA NAGARAJU, S/O RAMA CHANDRA RAO, R/O D.NO 21-1-54, ALLURI SEETHARAMARAJU STREET, MUTYALAMPADU, SATYANARAYANAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF AP, AMARAVATHI THROUGH STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SATYANARAYANAPURAM POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. PRASAD BABU MOGALATHURTI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. RAMANA ALLU The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/A1 and A2 seeking to quash the proceedings in Cr.No.613 of 2019, dated 27.12.2019 of Satyanarayanapuram Police Station, Vijayawada registered for the offences punishable under Sections 384, 506, 420 r/w 34 of IPC. 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned Public Prosecutor produced a copy of instructions furnished by the Sub- Inspector of Police, Satyanarayanapuram Police Station, Vijayawada, wherein it is stated that, after completion of the investigation, the case was referred as ‘Civil in Nature’ vide C.No.227/ACP-ND/2020, dated 13.09.2020. Therefore, no cause survives in this petition, and it has become infructuous. 3. Recording the above instructions, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this petition, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Dated: 04.02.2025 S D P 3 166 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3453/2020 Dated: 04.02.2025 S D P