IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.9643 of 2025 Date of Decision: 20.06.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Pravesh Kumar ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly admits that on account of subsequent developments, present petition has been rendered infructuous and accordingly, the same may be disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach competent authority by way of representation, seeking therein transfer at a convenient station on account of adverse family circumstances. 2. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that he is not averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Consequently, in view of the above, present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous reserving liberty to the petitioner to file representation to the competent authority within one week, seeking therein transfer at a convenient station on account of adverse family circumstances, which shall be decided by the competent authority within two weeks taking note of Transfer Policy, which certainly enables an employee to seek transfer at a convenient station on account of adverse family circumstances. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. June 20, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (sunil) Judge 2