Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 170872 (ALL)

SARVESH JAISWAL @ SARVESH KUMAR JAISWAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

ABAIL/2832/2024 · 2025-04-23

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23176 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2832 of 2024 Applicant :- Sarvesh Jaiswal @ Sarvesh Kumar Jaiswal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Deo Raj Singh,Rajesh Kumar Anand Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Dev Raj Singh, the the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Diwakar Singh, the learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. bearing Case Crime No.1862 of 2008, under Sections 323, 304 I.P.C. and Section 3 (2) (5) SC/ST Act, registered at Police Station Gangaghat, District Unnao. 3. After advancing his submissions at some length, the learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press the instant application and the applicant will appear before trial court and apply for his release on bail. 4. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is rejected. 5. In case the applicant appears before the trial court and applies for his release on bail his application shall be considered expeditiously in accordance with law without being influenced by rejection of this anticipatory bail application. (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 23.4.2025 Ram. Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench