Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17087 (CHH)

DEEPAK VERMA v. SMT. RASHMI VERMA

CRR/536/2020 · 2025-07-07

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:31304 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 536 of 2020 Deepak Verma S/o Dr. Prasad Verma @ D.P. Verma Aged About 32 Years R/o Subhash Ward, Bhatapara, P.S. Bhatapara, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh. --- Applicant versus Smt. Rashmi Verma W/o Deepak Verma Aged About 28 Years R/o Through Krishna Kumar Dhurandhar, R/o Vasundranagar, South 19/11, Bhilai - 3, Tahsil Patan, District Durg Chhattisgarh.. --- Non-Applicant For Applicant : None along with CRR No. 621 of 2020 Smt. Rashmi Verma W/o Deepak Verma Aged About 28 Years At Present R/o C/o Krishna Kumar Dhurandhar, Vasundara Nagar, South 19/11, Bhilai, Tahsil Patan, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. --- Applicant Versus Deepak Verma S/o Dr. Prasad Verma @ D.P. Verma Aged About 32 Years R/o Subhash Ward, Bhatapara, Police Station Bhatapara, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar- Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Non-applicant RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN 2 For Applicant : None For Non-applicant : None Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 08.07 .202 5 . 1. None appears nor any representation made on behalf of the both the applicant to press these revision on repeated calls. 2. In criminal revision No. 536/2020 has been filed by the applicant with the following prayer: “It is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to: i. Call for entire record of Misc. Criminal Case No.213/15 from 1st Additional Principle Judge, Family Court, Durg for its kind perusal. ii. to set-aside/quash the impugned order dated 13.03.2020 passed by the 1st Additional Principle Judge, Family Court, Durg, in the larger interest of justice. iii. Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court this fit looking to the facts and circumstances, of the case may also be granted.” 3. In criminal revision No. 621/2020 has been filed by the applicant with the following prayer: “It is therefore, prayed that, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to allow the revision and be 3 pleased to enhance the maintenance amount awarded in the order dated 13-03-2020 (Annexure A-1), in the interest of justice.” 4. It appears that with the passage of time, the applicant has lost interest in pursuing this matter. 5. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed on this ground alone. Interim relief if any stands vacated. 6. Let a copy of this order as well as original record of this case be transmitted to the trial Court concerned forthwith for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rahul Dewangan