1 APHC010230152019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10197/2019 Between: Kathula Mangi Reddy and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G SIMHADRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. . 2. GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…..to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in (i) not implementing their decision to regularize the services of the petitioners as Teachers in Tribal Welfare Ashram Schools vide Minutes of the Meeting dt.10.9.2008 and (ii) creating artificial break in the services of the petitioners during summer vacation, though Petitioners have been working for the last several years against sanctioned vacancies on contract basis having selected 2 and appointed in 2007 and later in regular selection process, as illegal, un-just, arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the Doctrines of Promissory Estoppels and Legitimate Expectation and also contrary to G.O.Ms.No.3 Social Welfare (TW.EDN.II) Department dt.10.1.2000 and consequently direct Respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners with all consequential benefits and pass such other order or orders …...” 2. Heard Sri G.Simhadri, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-II, appearing for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that in pursuance of the interim order passed by this Court dated 30.07.2019, the services of 1st petitioner has been regularized and all the petitioners are continuing. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner Nos.2 and 3 to workout their remedies for regularization, according to law. 4. In the light of the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of making the interim order as absolute. However, the petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are at liberty to workout their remedies, according to law, regarding their regularization. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.04.2025 ARR 3 128 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10197/2019 Dt.09.04.2025 ARR