POONAM YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/11291/2024 · 2025-01-09
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170823 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170823 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1684 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11291 of 2024 Petitioner :- Poonam Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Girdhari Lal Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. Heard. The present writ petition has been filed alleging that the petitioner, who is represented by his brother, is in illegal detention of respondent no. 4. The petitioner had earlier approached this Court by filing Habeas Corpus Writ Petition No. 363 of 2024 in which instructions were received that the victim is aged about 20 years and she wants to stay on her own. In view of the aforesaid instructions the habeas corpus petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The said order also record that the petitioner was permitted to avail remedy as may be available to him under law. A fresh Habeas Corpus Writ Petition No. 374 of 2024 was filed which was also dismissed as withdrawn by a Division Bench of this Court. In the present case, no right has been shown by the petitioner as the only remedy available to the petitioner on the allegation of illegal detention was for issuance of writ of habeas corpus which has been dismissed by learned Single Judge as well as the Division Bench of this Court. The relief(s) claimed in the present writ petition are also in the nature of relief for habeas corpus, as such no case for interference is made out. The writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 9.1.2025 J. K. Dinkar Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench