Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 170812 (ALL)

MOHAMMAD AKRAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DIST. MAGISTRATE DIST. SULTANPUR AND ANOTHER

/11328/2024 · 2025-01-13

Brij Raj Singh, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2158-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11328 of 2024 Petitioner :- Mohammad Akram Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Dist. Magistrate Dist. Sultanpur And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Nayak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. Heard. There is some order under Section 125 against the son of the petitioner and it's enforcement is under process under Section 128 Cr.P.C. vide order dated 15.11.2024. The petitioner is the father. He apprehends attachment of his property. In spite, of being asked as to whether the property is ancestral, no proper reply was submitted. We, therefore, see no reason to interfere in the matter, but however, leave it open for the concerned to seek other remedies, as may be prescribed in law. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. Order Date :- 13.1.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Brij Raj Singh, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench