Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 170811 (ALL)

GHASITELAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO AND 5 OTHERS

/11201/2024 · 2025-01-09

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1502-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11201 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ghasitelal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Uttam Kumar Verma,Manish Kumar Rajput,Raj Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy, J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and Sri Shaiwal Kumar Yadav, learned counsel, who has filed power on behalf of opposite party no.5, which is taken on record. 2. Considering the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to opposite party no.6 is dispensed with. 3. The petitioner alleges encroachment by opposite parties no.5 and 6 on his bhumidhari land as claimed. If it is so, let the petitioner get the boundaries of his gatas demarcated if he is entitled to do so, whereupon the dispute may be resolved, as ultimately, if it is found after demarcation that there is an encroachment, then remedial measures may be taken as per law or if it is found that there is no encroachment, then the matter would rest as it is. 3. Writ petition stands disposed of. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 9.1.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench