PREMLATA WIFE OF RAVI KUMAR v. SURENDRA KUMAR SON OF RAGHUNANDAN
CW/8532/2024 · 2025-01-29
Sudesh Bansal
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17081 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17081 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:4012] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8532/2024 Premlata Wife Of Ravi Kumar, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of Ballabhgarh, Tehsil Bhusawar, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus
1. Surendra Kumar Son Of Raghunandan, Resident Of Ballabhgarh, Tehsil Bhusawar, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan)
2. Babu Lal Son Of Ramcharan, Resident Of Ballabhgarh, Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) (Now Deceased)
3. Anguri Wife Of Late Babu Lal Son Of Ramcharan, Resident Of Ballabhgarh, Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) (Now Deceased)
4. Dinesh Son Of Late Babu Lal Son Of Ramcharan, Resident Of Ballabhgarh, Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) (Now Deceased) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Bhavana Ladha for Mr. Dheeraj Singhal For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 29/01/2025
1. Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, impugning the order dated 23.01.2024 passed in Execution Petition No.02/2019 by the Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Bhusawar, District Bharatpur, dismissing the application under Section 10 read with Section 151 of CPC.
2. Counsel for the petitioner, having instructions from petitioner, submits that challenge to the impugned order has become infructuous, therefore, he does not want to press the writ petition.
3. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as not press.
4. Stay application and any other pending application, if any, stand disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /387