DEEPAK KUMAR ROY ALIAS DEEPAK RAI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5096/2025 · 2025-06-25
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17081 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17081 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:17055 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 5096 of 2025
------ Deepak Kumar Roy @ Deepak Rai, aged about 27 years, Son of Bhaironath Roy, Resident of Rajaulatu, Unidih, Rampur, Ranchi, P.O. & P.S. –Namkum, District –Ranchi.
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Shashank Shekhar Pd., Advocate For the State
: Mrs. Kumari Rashmi, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 25.06.2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No.476 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 103(1)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 27 of the Arms Act.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons has committed the murder of the father of the informant namely –Lal Madhusudan Rai. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and there is specific allegation against Umesh Rai and Manuel Khalkho of shooting dead Madhusudan Rai. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the basis of confessional statement of the Manuel Khalkho and the petitioner also confessed his guilt. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.02.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 12 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Ranchi, in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No.476 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu-Gunjan/