OM PRAKASH TANDI S/O SHRI CHENA RAM TANDI v. SMT. SHUBHRA SINGH
CCP/374/2024 · 2025-08-19
Ganesh Ram Meena
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17080 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17080 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:32443] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 374/2024
1. Om Prakash Tandi S/o Shri Chena Ram Tandi, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Roopathal, Nagaur Arwar Rajasthan
2. Ajit Singh Rathore S/o Shri Shravan Singh Rathore, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Rajputon Ka Bas, Padoo Kalan, Nagaur Rajasthan
3. Madan Lal S/o Hanuman Ram, Aged About 40 Years, Ward No.4, Lalas, Nagaur Rajasthan
4. Jitendra Singh Shekhawat S/o Shri Jagdev Singh Shekhawat, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Mahamandir Bagh, Ramila Maidan, Ward No.22, Sikar Rajasthan
5. Ved Prakash Sharma S/o Shri Ram Gopal Sharma, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Tehsil Mahuwa, Tekwla Mohall, Paota, (Dausa) Rajasthan
6. Narander Singh S/o Mool Chand, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Village Poonia Ka Bass (Himatpura) Post Devgaon (Nua) Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu
7. Mahesh Kumar Moondra S/o Shri Rampal Moondra, Aged About 39 Years, Rk/o 497, Kareda Bhilwara
8. Virendra Singh Rajput S/o Shri Mukut Singh, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Udi Kalan Rural Sawaimadhopur ----Petitioners Versus
1. Smt. Shubhra Singh, Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur Rajasthan
2. Shri Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Additional Director (Administration) Medical And Health Services Rajasthan, Jaipur
3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Singh For Respondent(s) :
[2025:RJ-JP:32443] (2 of 2) [CCP-374/2024] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 19/08/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondents have complied with the directions and, therefore, this contempt petition no more survives. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present civil contempt petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. The petitioners would be at liberty to challenge the order passed on the representation, if he has any grievance. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /156