LALJIT BHUIYAN ALLIAS LALJEET BHUIYAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5453/2025 · 2025-07-07
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17079 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17079 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:18151]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5453 of 2025
1. Laljit Bhuiyan @ Laljeet Bhuiyan, aged about 28 years,
2. Babulal Bhuiyan, aged 29 years Both sons of Late Modha Bhuiyan, residents of Nawadih Chaklawatola, P.O. and P.S. Chhipadohar, District-Latehar.
… Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioners : Mr. Ayush Kr. Verma , Adv. For the State : Mr. Gautam Rakesh, Addl. PP.
02 / 07.07.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Chhipadohar P.S. Case No.27 of 2024 instituted under Section 103, 238 of B.N.S., Section 27 of Arms Act and Section 17 of Criminal Law Amendment Act.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners committed murder of Chotu Kherwar, a Maoist extremist and the allegation is that Chotu Kherwar was murdered in connection with collection of levy amount and mutual supremacy in the organization. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false and the petitioners are not named in the FIR. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 17 of the bail application and they have been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused persons. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the
trial of the case and undertake not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioners on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M. Latehar in connection with Chhipadohar P.S. Case No.27 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioners will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-