SANTOSH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. SAINIK KALYAN VIBHAG GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/12702/2024 · 2025-01-03
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170788 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170788 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:176 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12702 of 2024 Petitioner :- Santosh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Sainik Kalyan Vibhag Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Singh,Rohit Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondents.
2. The grievance raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition is with regard to non-action of the respondents who has stopped deduction of the G.P.F contribution from the salary of the petitioner. The petitioner is still in service
3. From the above, this Court does not find any reason to entertain in exercise of power under Article 226 of Constitution of India specially considering the fact that the grievance of the petitioner can be adequately dealt with by the U.P. Public Service Tribunal.
4. In light of the above, the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of availability of alternative remedy before U.P. Public Service Tribunal. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 3.1.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench