Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 170782 (ALL)

SHOBHAWATI DEVI v. TEHSILDAR TEHSIL- ALAPUR, AMBEDKAR NAGAR AND 3 OTHERS

A227/6447/2024 · 2025-01-03

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:309 Court No. - 8 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6447 of 2024 Petitioner :- Shobhawati Devi Respondent :- Tehsildar Tehsil- Alapur, Ambedkar Nagar And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Mishra,Ajay Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent Nos.2 to 4 is dispensed with. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Case No.2285 of 2023, Computerized Case No.T2023040404022885 (Shobhawati Devi Vs. Shambhu Prasad) filed under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the respondent No.1. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to furnish an undertaking that the petitioner will not seek any unnecessary adjournment and shall also cooperate in the early disposal of the aforesaid case. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Case No.2285 of 2023, Computerized Case No.T2023040404022885 (Shobhawati Devi Vs. Shambhu Prasad) filed under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. The petitioner shall also furnish an undertaking, as mentioned above, along with a copy of this order. In case, if the petitioner does not furnish the aforesaid undertaking, then the petitioner shall not be entitled to the benefit of this order. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 3.1.2025 Ashutosh Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench