LINGARAJAPPA @ SWAMY DEAD BY LRS CHANDRAMMA v. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
MSA/33/2023 · 2025-09-03
V Srishananda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17073 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17073 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2024:KHC:27913 MSA No. 33 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JULY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 33 OF 2023 (LA)
BETWEEN:
1.
LINGARAJAPPA @ SWAMY, DEAD BY LRS,
CHANDRAMMA, W/O LATE LINGARAJAPPA @ SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS.
2. MAHADEVAPPA, S/O LATE LINGARAJAPPA @ SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS.
3. NAGARAJA, S/O LATE LINGARAJAPPA @ SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS.
ALL ARE R/AT:
CHANNAPURA VILLAGE, HALEKOTE HOBLI, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI GIRISH B. BALADARE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER HEMAVATHI RESERVOIR PROJECT(HNP) HASSAN-573 201.
2.
CHIEF ENGINEER, KAVERI NEERAVARI NIGAMA, HEMAVATHI RIVER PROJECT,
Digitally signed by GEETHAKUMARI PARLATTAYA S Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2024:KHC:27913 MSA No. 33 of 2023
GORURU, HASSAN-573 201. …RESPONDENTS
THIS MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL IS FIELD UNDER SECTION 54(1) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT PRAYING TO MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 10-10-2011 PASSED IN LAC NO.91/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, HOLENARASIPURA AND JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED IN LAC APPEAL NO 25/2020 DATED 15-02-2022 ON THE FILE OF V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT AT HASSAN BY ENHANCE THE COMPENSATION WITH INTEREST AND OTHER STATUTORY BENEFITS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Since matter was listed for non-compliance of office objections for 6th time, as a final opportunity, appellant was permitted to comply with office objections during course of day. It is reported that appellant has not complied office objections. Hence, there is no other option than to conclude that appellant is not interested in pursuing this appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE
GPG CT:SNN