Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17073 (JHR)

M/S NATIONAL FUELS INDUSTRY v. CHAIRMAN, BHARAT COAKING COAL LIMITED

WPC/6643/2010 · 2025-05-09

Sujit Narayan Prasad

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:14080 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6643 of 2010 --------- M/s National Fuels Industry, Chandarpur, P.O. & P.S. Udaipur, District-Varanasi (U.P.) through its Partner Sri Shashi Bhushan, son of Sri S.N. Pandey, Resident of Baba Niwas, Bank More, P.O. & P.S. Nag Nagar, District-Dhanbad. … … Petitioner Versus 1. Chairman Bharat Cocking Coal Limited, Koyla Bhawan, P.O. Koyla Nagar, P.S. Saraidhela, District-Dhanbad. 2. Chief Managing Director cum Managing Director, Bharat Cocking Coal Limited, Koyla Bhawan, P.O. Koyla Nagar, P.S. Saraidhela, District-Dhanbad. 3. Chief General Manager, Bharat Cocking Coal Limited, Koyla Bhawan, P.O. Koyla Nagar, P.S. Saraidhela, District Dhanbad. 4. General Manager (S&M), Bharat Cocking Coal Limited, Koyla Bhawan, P.O. Koyla Nagar, P.S. Saraidhela, District-Dhanbad. … … Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajendra Krishna, Advocate For the Resp.-BCCL : Mr. Pratyush, Advocate ---------- 07/Dated: 09th May, 2025 1. Mr. Rajendra Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, has submitted that he does not intend to press the present writ petition, however, liberty may be reserved to the writ petitioner to avail the remedy for redressal of his grievance, if any. 2. Mr. Pratyush, learned counsel associated with the office of Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta, learned counsel for the respondent-BCCL is present who is having no objection to the submission as has been made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed with the liberty to the writ petitioner that the withdrawal of the present writ petition will not come in the way of redressal of his grievance, if any subsisting, while approaching the appropriate forum. 2025:JHHC:14080 2 4. In consequence thereof, pending interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) Saurabh/-