Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1707 (PNJ)

AJAY NAGPAL v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/70253/2025 · 2026-03-23

Alok Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (130) AJAY NAGPAL STATE OF HA CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. regular bail granted to re learned Additional 29.04.2025, under Section 80 of BNS, at Police S 2. present petition with lib particulars. 3. withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. 4. on the merits of the case and the liberty granted is only on the request of the counsel for the petitioner and is not a direction. March 23, 2026 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AJAY NAGPAL Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Brijender Kaushik, Advocate for the peti Ms. Akshita Chauhan, DAG, Haryana ***** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been fi regular bail granted to respondent No.2 vid dditional Sessions Judge, Panchkula in case FIR No.76 dated 29.04.2025, under Section 80 of BNS, at Police S Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file fresh one with complete and better In light of the above, the present with liberty aforesaid. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the liberty granted is only on the request of the counsel for the petitioner and is not a direction. March 23, 2026 speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-70253-2025 Date of Decision:- 23.03.2026 ……Petitioner ……Respondents ALOK JAIN , Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Akshita Chauhan, DAG, Haryana. ***** The present petition has been filed seeking cancellation of spondent No.2 vide order dated 22.07.2025 by Judge, Panchkula in case FIR No.76 dated 29.04.2025, under Section 80 of BNS, at Police Station Kalka, Panchkula. for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the erty to file fresh one with complete and better the present petition is dismissed as It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the liberty granted is only on the request of the counsel for the petitioner and is not a direction. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 23.03.2026 ……Petitioner ……Respondents cancellation of e order dated 22.07.2025 by Judge, Panchkula in case FIR No.76 dated for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the erty to file fresh one with complete and better is dismissed as It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the liberty granted is only on the request of the MANJU 2026.03.23 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document