Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1707 (AP)

SRI MAHANANDIESWARA CONSTRUCTIONS v. PEEYUSH KUMAR, IAS

CC/4114/2025 · 2026-04-22

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010696582025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4114/2025 Between: 1. SRI MAHANANDIESWARA CONSTRUCTIONS, REP BY. S.RAMESH NAIDU S/O. NAGALINGAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RIO. D.NO. 25/427-10-A3-A-1, R.S. ROAD, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI. 2. BANDI SESHANNA THE COMMISSIONER, NANDYAL MUNICIPALITY NANDYAL NANDYAL DISTRICT. 3. K GURAPPA YADHAV, THE MUNICIPAL ENGINEER NANDYAL MUNICIPALITY NANDYAL NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to take the cognizance of the offence of Contempt of Court committed by the respondents herein and to punish them for violating the orders dated 22.08.2025 passed in W.P No. 22372 of 2025 and to pass. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of Respondent No.l on 19.03.2026, as directed by this Honble Court vide order dated 06.02.2026 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MARELLA RADHA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI 2. GUDAPATI LAKSHMI NARAYANA The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.22372 of 2025, dated 28.08.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dt:23.04.2026 SR