Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No.2208 of 2025 Mohd. Isha
…..….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand
….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. B.N. Molakhi, Deputy Advocate General for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.1233 of 2023, dated 21.12.2023, under Sections 107, 120-B, 342, 366-A, 368, 376(3), 506 IPC and Section 67-B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Sections 13, 14, 16, 17, and 3(a) r/w 4(2) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Police Station Kotwali Manglaur, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3.
It is argued that the co-accused having similar role has already been granted bail; the role is not dissimilar and the grounds are also similar.
4.
This fact is not denied by learned State Counsel.
5.
Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
6.
The bail application is allowed.
2
7.
Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
11.12.2025 Sanjay SANJAY KANOJIA Digitally signed by SANJAY KANOJIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=e50e50b49596520698eff87e0a08bbd504686df4d1af c60f54a287831dec46fe, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26EEB7122ED0DD23233A255DD8EC450A84B5 15A087CAEFD1B3179A7DEAE40699, cn=SANJAY KANOJIA Date: 2025.12.12 18:57:47 +05'30'