Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17066 (AP)

Patan Yousuf Babu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/15157/2020 · 2025-09-03

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010230282020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 15157/2020 Between: 1. PATAN YOUSUF BABU, S/O.BABU KHAN, (IN THE IMPUGNED ORDER SHOWN AS PATAN YOUSUF KHAN @ YOUSUF BUDDI) AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/O. ISLAMPET, GANNAVARAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DSITRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GANNNAVARAM POLICE STATION, GANNAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or direction particularly in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, A).To declare the order in MC.No.12/Extern/2020, dated 14.7.2020, on the file of the 2nd respondent, as illegal, void, arbitrary and violating the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 19 and 21 of the constitution of India apart from violating the principles of natural justice. B).Consequently, to set-aside the order passed in MC.No.12/Extern/2020, dated 14.7.2020, on the file of the 2nd respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PENUMAKA VENKATA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ .... to issue writ or direction particularly in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, A).To declare the order in MC.No.12/Extern/2020, dated 14.7.2020, on the file of the 2nd respondent, as illegal, void, arbitrary and violating the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 19 and 21 of the constitution of India apart from violating the principles of natural justice. B).Consequently, to set-aside the order passed in MC.No.12/Extern/2020, dated 14.7.2020, on the file of the 2nd respondent and pass ....” 2. Sri Penumaka Venkata Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the subject matter of this Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 15157 of 2020 04.09.2025 Mjl /*