Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 170657 (ALL)

RAJ KUMAR SONI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOUSING AND URBAN PLANNING LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/11223/2024 · 2025-01-03

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:439-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11223 of 2024 Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Soni Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Housing And Urban Planning Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiv Kumar Vishwakarma,Jeet Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ajaay Kumar Singh,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Rajan Roy, J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri R.S. Tomar, learned Chief Standing Counsel for opposite parties no.1, 3 and 4 and Sri Ajay Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for opposite party no.2. 2. The petitioner is a subsequent purchaser of the house in question, which he has purchased from the original allottee. It is an admitted position that the original allottee was not in possession nor is the petitioner in possession. The Lucknow Development Authority, as claimed by the petitioner, has written to the police authorities for providing necessary police for facilitating handing over of possession. We do not wish to enter into this factual issue. 3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Lucknow (East), Police Commissionerate, Lucknow may look into the matter in the context of letter of the Lucknow Development Authority dated 16.04.2024, a copy of which is annexed as Annexure-6 to the petition, and do the needful. Apart from it, we see no reason to proceed any further at least as of now. 4. Writ petition stands disposed of. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 3.1.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench