Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:335-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11153 of 2024 Petitioner :- Najma Begum Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru.The Prin. Secy.Revenue Deptt. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Govind Kumar Chourasia Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard Shri Govind Kumar Chourasia, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner participated in an auction for settlement of fishery rights and claims to have been the highest bidder, however, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly admits that the petitioner was not present at the time of auction but her son was present. This was on account of ailment of the petitioner. 3. The grievance is that the money which is to be deposited by the petitioner as a consequence to the aforesaid auction is not being allowed to be deposited, however, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State says that unless the petitioner was present at the time of auction and had deposited the money she would have no right. These are not matters which should be seen under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner may approach the concerned Authorities raising her grievance or may avail other remedies as may be prescribed in law. 4. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 3.1.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench