ANURAG RAJPUT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. OF SPORT AND YOUTH WELFARE AND 2 OTHERS
/1145/2024 · 2025-01-08
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170641 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170641 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1226-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1145 of 2024 Petitioner :- Anurag Rajput Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Of Sport And Youth Welfare And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Singh,Anand Dwivedi,Anand Mohan Awasthi,Kaushal Kishore Srivastava,Yashwin Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. Prima facie, we do not gather any concrete material, on the basis of which it can be inferred that the purchase of some items has been made without calling for the quotation. In respect of the purchases so made, the complaint was also looked into by the State.
3. It is informed that an inquiry was conducted by the State and it was not found that any irregularity had been committed in the purchases so made. The only irregularity pointed out is that the opposite party no. 3 failed to inform the department regarding the firm which was owned by his son.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has however pointed out that on account of this non-disclosure, no loss has been incurred by the State pertaining to the purchases so made.
5. That being the position, we leave it open to the State government to conclude the proceedings pending, if any, expeditiously in accordance with law.
6. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. . [Subhash Vidyarthi,J.] [Attau Rahman Masoodi, J.] Order Date :- 8.1.2025 kanhaiya Digitally signed by :- KANHAIYA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench