106+238-8443.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CMS-8494 & 8928-CII-2025 in/and CR-8443-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.05.2025 SADHU RAM (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS . . . .PETITIONER Vs. OM PARKASH AND OTHERS . . . . RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: - Mr.Ashwani Verma, Advocate, for the applicant/pe$$oner. Mr.Ranjit Saini, Advocate, for the respondents. DEEPAK GUPTA, J. A&er hearing learned counsel for both the par$es, it has emerged that in the final par$$on (Annexure A2), khasra No.282//1/4 to the extent of 10 marla; and khasra No.398//1/2 to the extent of 2 marla were allo7ed to Sadhu Ram (pe$$oner-now deceased through his LRs). Learned counsel for the respondents has undertaken that respondents will not intervene in handing over the possession of the said allo7ed land i.e. 12 marla to pe$$oner Sadhu Ram (pe$$oner-now deceased through his LRs). Learned counsel for the pe$$oner is sa$sfied with the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for the respondents. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, present revision is hereby disposed of along with all the pending applica$ons, considering the undertaking given by ld. counsel for the respondents. However, it is made clear that even pe$$oner will not create any hurdle in handing over possession of that land, which has been allo7ed to other co-sharers in the final par$$on order (Annexure A2). 12.05.2025 Vivek (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes Whether reportable? No PRIYANKA 2025.05.12 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document