JANARDAN SINGH v. U.P. UPBHOKTA SAHKARI SANGH LTD. THRU. ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND ANOTHER
/12631/2024 · 2025-01-09
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170624 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170624 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1698 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12631 of 2024 Petitioner :- Janardan Singh Respondent :- U.P. Upbhokta Sahkari Sangh Ltd. Thru. Its Managing Director And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Anilesh Tewari,Surabhi Rawat Counsel for Respondent :- Ayush Chaudhary Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. (Order on I.A. No. NIL of 2025)
1. The application for amendment filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard. 3. This is an application for impleadment. 4. Shri Ayush Chaudhary, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents states that he does not intend to file objections to the same. 5. On due consideration, the amendment application is allowed. 6. Let the amendment be incorporated during course of the day. (Order on Memo of Petition)
7. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Shri Ayush Chaudhary, learned counsel for the respondents. 8. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being finally disposed of. 9. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having retired on 31.01.2020, the entire
dues of leave encashment and bonus with interest have still not been paid till date. 10. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matter at some length, prays that in this regard he may be permitted to submit a fresh representation to the respondent No.1 for redressal of his grievances and the respondent no.1 be directed to consider the same in accordance with law within a specified time to which learned counsel for the respondents has no objection. 11. Accordingly, liberty is granted to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation for the redressal of his grievances pertaining to his grievance within a period of two weeks from today before the respondent No.1, who may consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with rules and shall endeavour to decide the representation by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and relevant rules within a further period of six weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with the certified copy of this order. 12. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. 13. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner.
Order Date :- 9.1.2025 S. Shivhare Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench