SARITA SAROJ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
CRLA/4056/2024 · 2025-05-19
Rajnish Kumar
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170605 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170605 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 4056 of 2024 Appellant :- Sarita Saroj Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Shubham Tripathi,Aditya Vikram Singh,Harsh Vardhan Kediya,Inam Uddin Ahmed,Mohd. Salman,Sayed Jamal Rizvi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,P.K. Singh Bisen Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. I.A. 3 of 2025 This is an application for withdrawal of the appeal.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the bail application was rejected from the court of Special Judge S.C./S.T. Act, therefore, this appeal was filed. However, the chargesheet has not been filed in the S.C./S.T. Act, therefore, the appellant does not want to press the appeal and it may be dismissed as such with liberty to avail appropriate remedy as may be available under law. To which there is no objection by the other side. In view of above, the application is allowed and the appeal is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. As prayed by learned counsel for the appellant, Office is
directed to return the certified copy of the documents annexed with the petition as per Rules of the Court, after keeping photocopy on record.
Order Date :- 19.5.2025 Raj Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench