Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 170601 (ALL)

HARI OM SONKAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

/6483/2024 · 2025-01-07

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:916 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6483 of 2024 Petitioner :- Hari Om Sonkar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suresh Kumar Upadhyay,Ashutosh Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the state-respondent. 2. The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 12.11.2024 whereby, the transfer application filed under Section 24 of the CPC was rejected. 3. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the reasoning recorded that there was an intent to delay the proceedings is mala-fide as the petitioner has been cooperating with the disposal of the case. 4. Considering the fact that there are lack of material particulars to cast the cloud on the apprehension with regard to the order impugned. No interference is called for in exercise of power under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petition cannot be entertained, which is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 7.1.2025 Ashutosh Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench